Alex Albon says Williams suffered a “self-fulfilling damage” with the early season timesaving however weight-adding measures on its 2024 Formulation 1 automobile, which led to extra crash harm.
The British crew’s 2024 season was blighted by crashes from begin to end, with its FW46 automobile additionally beginning the yr over the load restrict of 798kg to the extent it was shedding 0.45 seconds a lap, earlier than it was lightened by way of its growth programme.
Partially, this was because of the preliminary iterations of sure chassis parts – reminiscent of suspension components – being made out of steel as a substitute of lighter carbon-fibre.
This was deemed vital as a result of Williams modified its automobile construct course of for the yr simply gone, which meant components arrived a lot later, because it strived to modernise its manufacturing system.
Metallic components are faster to provide than these in carbon, with Williams additionally making an attempt to make its automobile lighter total anyway.
Watch: Rating Autosport’s Prime 50 Drivers of 2024 – 30 to 21
It managed to shed 14kg from its whole chassis weight in comparison with 2023, whereas nonetheless being over the restrict.
However the added weight of steel components meant extra power going by way of a monocoque in a crash, reminiscent of when Williams was compelled to sideline Logan Sargeant after Albon crashed in Australian Grand Prix apply, his chassis was too broken for use once more and the crew didn’t have a spare on the time.
Albon revealed the scenario when requested if there was any specific trigger for the various crashes he, Franco Colapinto and Sargeant had within the season simply gone.
“There is a combine,” Albon informed Motorsport.com in an unique interview. “There’s a mixture of driver errors, there’s a mixture of points.
“I wouldn’t name them points across the automobile however, for instance, like Brazil [where Albon crashed in the wet Q3], there are issues the place in a technical standpoint, it is type of a driver drawback, but it surely’s probably not.
“It is simply techniques that had been… we modified and areas the place they had been simply type of very onerous.
“Collectively, we may have achieved a greater job and I feel we’d have been capable of keep away from it. So, there is a little bit of that occurring.
Logan Sargeant, Williams FW46, will get out of the automobile after crashing out of the race
Photograph by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Pictures
“There’s additionally simply, even if you happen to take the beginning of the yr, for instance, we went by way of fairly a couple of tubs. I feel Melbourne was one. Suzuka was one.
“However, really, if you happen to take a look at it, a part of the issue is inside the weight [issue] itself.
“We had some items on the automobile that had been metallic slightly than carbon. So, they really had been creating a few of the damaged tubs.
“So, it was virtually like a self-fulfilling damage that we had. So, there’s stuff like that, which from race one [meant] we had been on the again foot.”
When Motorsport.com put Albon’s level to Williams’s chief engineer Dave Robson, he replied: “Sure, that’s true to some extent.
“Undecided whether or not that trigger and impact assertion is precisely proper, however we undoubtedly had some metallic parts on the automobile that are actually all carbon and will have been carbon from the outset.
“And that undoubtedly does change the load that goes by way of the chassis, so these are the entrance suspension components.
“The rationale for doing that’s you’ll be able to design say a metallic trackrod rather more shortly and machine them rather more shortly than you can also make carbon parts.
“So, when you get behind, that is a manner of recovering a few of the time. You pay a small mass penalty for the part itself if it is one thing like a trackrod.
“They had been on the automobile for some time after which we quickly up to date these and undoubtedly if you happen to do this [for] a few of the entrance suspension parts and then you definately endure a heavy affect, a great deal of the chassis are a bit totally different so yeah it most likely did contribute to a few of the preliminary points.”
On this article
Alex Kalinauckas
Formulation 1
Alex Albon
Williams
Be the primary to know and subscribe for real-time information e mail updates on these subjects
Subscribe to news alerts